Psychoanalysis is a therapeutic approach that has been the subject of study and debate over the years. Developed by Sigmund Freud, she seeks to understand human behavior through the analysis of the unconscious. In this article, we will explore the comparisons between psychoanalysis and moral therapies of the time, seeking to understand how these approaches differ and complement each other.
To begin with, it is important to understand the historical context in which thepsychoanalysisemerged. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, moral therapies were very common. These approaches focused on the idea that emotional and behavioral problems were the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education.
With the arrival of psychoanalysis, this view began to change. Psychoanalysis proposed that emotional and behavioral problems had deeper roots, related to the unconscious and children’s experiences. This represented a major change in relation to moral therapies, which until then were based on religious or philosophical principles.
Introduction to Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis is a therapeutic approach that seeks to understand human behavior through the analysis of the unconscious. It proposes that emotional and behavioral problems have deeper roots, related to children’s and unconscious experiences.
One of the main differences between psychoanalysis and moral therapies is the way they address the problem. Moral therapies tend to focus on the idea that problems are the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education, while psychoanalysis seeks to understand the underlying causes of problems.
In addition, psychoanalysis also differs from moral therapies regarding the way they address the therapist’s role. In moral therapies, the therapist tends to be seen as an authoritarian figure who imposes his worldview on the patient, while in psychoanalysis, the therapist is seen as a facilitator who helps the patient understand his own thoughts and feelings.
The moral therapies of the time
The moral therapies of the time when psychoanalysis arose were based on religious or philosophical principles. They proposed that emotional and behavioral problems were the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education.
One of the main characteristics of moral therapies is the idea that problems can be solved by applying moral principles. They tend to focus on the idea that patients need to be “corrected” or “polite” to become more morally straight people.
However, moral therapies also have their limitations. They can be very rigid and not take into account the individual needs of patients. In addition, they can be based on non -universal principles, which can lead to conflicts with patients’ values and beliefs.
Comparisons between psychoanalysis and moral therapies
One of the main comparisons between psychoanalysis and moral therapies is the way they address the problem. Psychoanalysis seeks to understand the underlying causes of problems, while moral therapies tend to focus on the idea that problems are the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education.
Another important comparison is the way they address the therapist’s role. In psychoanalysis, the therapist is seen as a facilitator who helps the patient understand his own thoughts and feelings, while in moral therapies, the therapist tends to be seen as an authoritarian figure who imposes his worldview on the patient.
In addition, psychoanalysis also differs from moral therapies in relation to how they address the importance of childhood and unconscious. Psychoanalysis proposes that children’s and unconscious experiences play a key role in personality formation, while moral therapies tend to focus more on the idea that problems are the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education.
Conclusion
In conclusion, psychoanalysis and moral therapies of the time have very different approaches to the treatment of emotional and behavioral problems. Psychoanalysis seeks to understand the underlying causes of problems, while moral therapies tend to focus on the idea that problems are the result of a lack of morality or inadequate education.
It is important to note that both psychoanalysis and moral therapies have their limitations and advantages. Psychoanalysis may be very effective in helping patients understand their own thoughts and feelings, but it can also be a slow and time consuming process. Moral therapies, on the other hand, may be faster and easier to implement, but they can also be very rigid and not take into account the individual needs of patients.
Ultimately, the choice between psychoanalysis and moral therapies depends on the patient’s needs and preferences. It is important that patients have access to a variety of therapeutic options and that they can work with a therapist who is sensitive to their needs and goals.
