Hello, I am João Barros, psychoanalyst and writer, and I am here to explore with you the fascinating world of psychoanalysis. Over the years, psychoanalysis has evolved and branched into different schools of thought, each with its own unique approaches and perspectives. In this article, we will dive into the differences between the psychoanalytic formations of different schools and understand how these distinctions impact our understanding of the human mind.
Introduction to Psychoanalytic Schools
THEpsychoanalysisFounded by Sigmund Freud is a theory and practice that seeks to understand the structure and functioning of the human mind. Over time, different thinkers and practitioners developed their own interpretations and methods, giving rise to various psychoanalytic schools. These schools are not mutually exclusive, and many psychoanalysts incorporate elements of several of them in their work.
Some of the most influential schools include classical psychoanalysis, self psychology, intersubjective approach, lacanian analysis and psychodynamic therapy. Each of these schools has its own psychoanalytic formations, which are shaped by specific theories about human development, personality structure and therapeutic processes.
Classical Psychoanalysis: The Original Approach
Classical psychoanalysis, based on Freud’s works, emphasizes the importance of the unconscious, sexuality and the triple structure of personality (id, ego and superego). In this approach, the analyst acts as a “mirror” for the patient, helping him to explore his thoughts, feelings and repressed behaviors.
Psychoanalytic formation in this school tends to focus on the interpretation of dreams, the analysis of resistance and the resolution of the Oedipus complex. The goal is for the patient to reach insights on his unconscious motivations and develop greater self -awareness.
Psychology of the Self: Focus on Development
The psychology of the self, led by theorists like Heinz Kohut, focuses on the healthy development of the self (or me) and the needs of mirroring (reflex) and idealization. This approach highlights the importance of empathy and understanding in the therapeutic relationship.
Psychoanalytic formation in this school emphasizes the creation of a safe and welcoming environment, where the patient can experience and express their needs and feelings. The goal is to strengthen the patient’s self, promoting greater cohesion and self -esteem.
Intersubjective approach: the importance of the relationship
The intersubjective approach, developed by thinkers such as Robert Stolorow and George Atwood, emphasizes the intersubjective nature of human experience. According to this perspective, reality is always co -creative between individuals, and the therapeutic relationship is seen as a unique intersubjective field.
Psychoanalytic formation in this school focuses on the exploitation of relational dynamics between the analyst and the patient. The goal is to create a “meeting zone” where both can share and process their experiences, promoting greater mutual understanding and insights.
Conclusions and Practical Applications
In short, different psychoanalytic schools offer different perspectives on the human mind and therapeutic processes. Each approach has its own psychoanalytic formations, which are shaped by specific theories about human development, personality structure and therapeutic processes.
Understanding these differences is critical to mental health professionals as they allow them to choose the most appropriate approach to each patient. In addition, this understanding can be applied to broader contexts, such as education and interpersonal relationships, helping us create more welcoming and promoters of human development.
I hope this article has contributed to clarify the differences between the psychoanalytic formations of different schools. If you have any questions or want to explore any of these topics, feel free to contact.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is psychoanalytic training?
Psychoanalytic training refers to the study, training and professional development process that an individual follows to become a psychoanalyst. This involves the acquisition of theoretical, practical and clinical knowledge about psychoanalysis, as well as the therapist’s own personal analysis, aiming to better understand human psychic processes and develop skills to work with patients.
What are the main schools of thought in psychoanalytic formation?
There are several schools of thought within psychoanalysis, including the Freudian school, the Jungian school, the Lacanian school, among others. Each of these schools has its own theories, methods and approaches to human development, personality and the treatment of psychological disorders. The choice of a school depends on the interests, objectives and personal philosophy of the professional.
How do psychoanalytic formations differ from each other?
Psychoanalytic formations differ significantly in terms of curriculum, duration, teaching methods and clinical practice. Some schools may focus more on the theory and history of psychoanalysis, while others may prioritize practical experience and clinical supervision. In addition, therapeutic approaches also vary, with some schools emphasizing the importance of the therapeutic relationship, while others may focus more on resolution of intrapsychic conflicts.
What is the role of personal analysis in psychoanalytic formation?
Personal analysis is a fundamental component in psychoanalytic formation. It involves the therapist himself undergo a process of self -analysis, with the aim of better understanding his own psychic processes, conflicts and defenses. This allows the therapist to develop greater awareness of himself and improve his ability to work with patients more effectively and ethically.
How to choose the right psychoanalytic formation for me?
Choosing the right psychoanalytic training depends on several factors, including their professional interests, personal objectives and philosophy about psychoanalysis. It is important to research different programs, talk to experienced professionals and consider factors such as course duration, curriculum, therapeutic approach and opportunities for clinical practice. In addition, it is essential to reflect on your own motivations and expectations regarding psychoanalytic formation.
